termiNIL / Analysis / SEC vs Big Ten: Which Conference Actually Has More NIL Money?
Data

SEC vs Big Ten: Which Conference Actually Has More NIL Money?

The short answer

The SEC has more total modeled NIL value than the Big Ten — $616.4M to $588.5M, a 4.7% edge — while fielding two fewer teams, which gives it a $38.5M average roster against the Big Ten's $32.7M. The Big Ten still holds two of the three most valuable rosters in the sport: Oregon at $51.8M and Ohio State at $48.9M, with Texas ($49.8M) the SEC's lone entry between them.

Key takeaways
  • The SEC totals $616.4M in modeled NIL value across 16 teams; the Big Ten totals $588.5M across 18 teams — a 4.7% gap in the SEC's favor.
  • The SEC's average roster is worth $38.5M against the Big Ten's $32.7M, a 17.8% gap — wider than the gap in conference totals.
  • Oregon's $51.8M roster is the most valuable in college football, $1.9M ahead of Texas, the SEC's top program.
  • The SEC places 14 of the 30 most valuable rosters nationally; the Big Ten places 9.
  • The SEC controls 20.5% of the $3.00B national NIL market; the Big Ten controls 19.6%.

Every August the same argument restarts: which conference actually has more money on the field. The answer usually comes from someone's collective-funding rumor or a reporter's off-the-record estimate, neither of which is checkable.

Roster value is checkable. It prices every scholarship player individually and sums the conference, which turns "which league has more NIL money" from a vibe into an arithmetic question. As of September 7, 2026, the answer has two different correct halves depending on what "more" means.

Which conference has more total NIL money?

The SEC, at $616.4 million across 16 teams to the Big Ten's $588.5 million across 18 teams — a 4.7% edge in the SEC's favor.

ConferenceTeamsTotal valueAvg per teamMarket share
SEC16$616.4M$38.5M20.5%
Big Ten18$588.5M$32.7M19.6%
ACC17$470.4M$27.7M15.7%
Big 1216$449.6M$28.1M15.0%

The SEC gets to a bigger number with two fewer programs, which means the real story isn't the total. It's the average.

Which conference has the deeper market, team for team?

Here the gap widens. An SEC roster is worth $38.5 million on average against the Big Ten's $32.7 million — a 17.8% difference, well beyond the 4.7% gap in the conference totals. Add two more programs at the Big Ten's average to the Big Ten's ledger and it still doesn't catch the SEC.

That's the case for "the SEC has more NIL money": not a bigger pot, but a materially richer roster at every position on the depth chart, conference-wide.

Does the Big Ten have the most valuable single roster?

Yes, and by a comfortable margin over any individual SEC team. Oregon's roster prices at $51.8 million, the most valuable in college football, with Ohio State third at $48.9 million. Texas, the SEC's best, sits between them at $49.8 million — $1.9 million behind Oregon.

#TeamConfRoster valueMost valuable player
1OregonBig Ten$51.8MDante Moore ($6.06M)
2TexasSEC$49.8MArch Manning ($6.21M)
3Ohio StateBig Ten$48.9MJulian Sayin ($6.24M)
4Notre DameIndependent$46.9MCJ Carr ($5.69M)
5GeorgiaSEC$46.7MGunner Stockton ($5.09M)
6Texas A&MSEC$46.2MMarcel Reed ($4.72M)
7AlabamaSEC$45.6MLotzeir Brooks ($1.84M)
8Ole MissSEC$44.5MTrinidad Chambliss ($5.79M)
9MiamiACC$44.2MDarian Mensah ($5.09M)
10OklahomaSEC$41.6MJohn Mateer ($2.47M)

The Big Ten holds two of the top three programs nationally. The SEC's one representative in that group, Texas, is sandwiched between them. Alabama at #7 is the SEC's depth argument in miniature — a top-ten roster with no player valued above $2 million, built on volume rather than a single enormous number.

Which conference has more elite programs?

This is where the SEC's breadth actually shows up in the count, not just the average. Of the 30 most valuable rosters in college football, the SEC places 14; the Big Ten places 9. The remaining seven split between the ACC, Big 12 and Notre Dame.

So the Big Ten wins the single most valuable roster and holds two of the top three. The SEC wins almost everywhere below that — more than half again as many programs in the national top 30, a materially higher per-team average, and the larger conference total despite fielding fewer teams.

Both things are true. "Which conference has more NIL money" depends on whether the question is about the one best-funded program or the conference as a whole. On the whole, it's the SEC.

Full team-by-team breakdowns, including every roster on this list, are in the team NIL value rankings and the termiNIL terminal. The valuation method behind every number here is explained in how NIL valuations are calculated.

Frequently asked questions

Does the SEC or the Big Ten have more NIL money?
The SEC, by termiNIL's model — $616.4 million in total roster value against the Big Ten's $588.5 million, a 4.7% gap. The SEC gets there with two fewer teams, so the real gap shows up in the per-team average: $38.5 million against the Big Ten's $32.7 million.
Which team has the most valuable roster, the SEC or the Big Ten?
The Big Ten's Oregon has the single most valuable roster in college football at $51.8 million, ahead of Texas, the SEC's top program, at $49.8 million. The SEC's advantage is depth across the conference, not the single best team.
Why does the SEC lead in total money with fewer teams than the Big Ten?
Because the gap lives in the average, not the count. An SEC roster is worth $38.5 million on average against $32.7 million for a Big Ten roster, a 17.8% difference that outweighs the Big Ten's two extra programs once the totals are added up.
Is Notre Dame part of the SEC or the Big Ten?
Neither. Notre Dame is a football independent and isn't counted in either conference's total, though its $46.9 million roster value would rank fourth nationally regardless of conference — behind only Oregon, Texas and Ohio State.

See every number behind this

termiNIL prices all 14,000+ FBS players with one transparent model. Open the terminal and check any roster, position group, or player yourself.

Launch the terminal
Methodology note. All player valuations on termiNIL are modeled estimates produced by a transparent bottom-up factor model — position base × role × production grade × team × market × social reach. They are not reported salaries, verified contract figures, or statements of fact about any athlete's actual compensation, and they are calibrated on an ongoing basis against confirmed market data. termiNIL is independent and is not affiliated with the NCAA, the College Sports Commission, any school, collective, or agency.

Keep reading